<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Creative Tools: Flash 9, Microsoft Expression Revelations at Flash on the Beach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmotion.com/2006/12/10/future-creative-tools-flash-9-microsoft-expression-revelations-at-flash-on-the-beach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmotion.com/2006/12/10/future-creative-tools-flash-9-microsoft-expression-revelations-at-flash-on-the-beach/</link>
	<description>Motion graphics, live visuals, VJing, video production, and interactive art</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmotion.com/2006/12/10/future-creative-tools-flash-9-microsoft-expression-revelations-at-flash-on-the-beach/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmotion.com/2006/12/10/future-creative-tools-flash-9-microsoft-expression-revelations-at-flash-on-the-beach/#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>Hey, I wasn't kidding when I said cool toys. I don't think you'll be able to use the Mac as a development platform for WPF, though, unless I missed something. (Some of the open-source .NET equivalent tools will work happily on Mac and Linux.) But yes, on Windows you're really set for choices: the WPF stuff, .NET and such (which tie nicely into WPF), Flash/Flex (which can run *inside* WPF), Java and Processing, and then good 'ol Max/MSP/Jitter (which in turn runs Java code and can even encapsulate Processing sketches). Phew. 

Looking down that list, you would *expect* to break into a sweat. But, oddly enough, NONE of these tools is really equivalent to another one. There probably is a tool that is best and most comfortable for realizing any given idea. And while I'd be lying if I didn't say there were a significant number of learning curves here, much of what you learn -- smart development patterns, visual techniques, good encapsulation and documentation, good object-oriented programming -- will serve you will with all of them.

Of course, I'll feel even better about them if I have some really good beer. And just as development tools, I wouldn't want to have to choose only ONE kind of beer ... you've got your blondes, your pale ales, your reds, your darks, your lagers ... and ALL taste better when Microsoft's buying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I wasn&#8217;t kidding when I said cool toys. I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll be able to use the Mac as a development platform for WPF, though, unless I missed something. (Some of the open-source .NET equivalent tools will work happily on Mac and Linux.) But yes, on Windows you&#8217;re really set for choices: the WPF stuff, .NET and such (which tie nicely into WPF), Flash/Flex (which can run *inside* WPF), Java and Processing, and then good &#8216;ol Max/MSP/Jitter (which in turn runs Java code and can even encapsulate Processing sketches). Phew. </p>
<p>Looking down that list, you would *expect* to break into a sweat. But, oddly enough, NONE of these tools is really equivalent to another one. There probably is a tool that is best and most comfortable for realizing any given idea. And while I&#8217;d be lying if I didn&#8217;t say there were a significant number of learning curves here, much of what you learn &#8212; smart development patterns, visual techniques, good encapsulation and documentation, good object-oriented programming &#8212; will serve you will with all of them.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;ll feel even better about them if I have some really good beer. And just as development tools, I wouldn&#8217;t want to have to choose only ONE kind of beer &#8230; you&#8217;ve got your blondes, your pale ales, your reds, your darks, your lagers &#8230; and ALL taste better when Microsoft&#8217;s buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vade</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmotion.com/2006/12/10/future-creative-tools-flash-9-microsoft-expression-revelations-at-flash-on-the-beach/#comment-3431</link>
		<dc:creator>vade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmotion.com/2006/12/10/future-creative-tools-flash-9-microsoft-expression-revelations-at-flash-on-the-beach/#comment-3431</guid>
		<description>Peter, I thought you might be interested in this: http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/8300945231/m/271000132831

Microsoft has released a .Net runtime as a plugin for OS X web browsers to run some of its latest tools. Check out the thread on ars - it looks potentially very interesting, and comes from a real syntax based programing background. The demos are pretty nice I have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I thought you might be interested in this: <a href="http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/8300945231/m/271000132831" rel="nofollow">http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/8300945231/m/271000132831</a></p>
<p>Microsoft has released a .Net runtime as a plugin for OS X web browsers to run some of its latest tools. Check out the thread on ars - it looks potentially very interesting, and comes from a real syntax based programing background. The demos are pretty nice I have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
