<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask CDMo Readers: Favourite Video Sharing Site for Quality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007/03/ask-cdmo-readers-favourite-video-sharing-site-for-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007/03/ask-cdmo-readers-favourite-video-sharing-site-for-quality/</link>
	<description>The home for visualists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007/03/ask-cdmo-readers-favourite-video-sharing-site-for-quality/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007/03/13/ask-cdmo-readers-favourite-video-sharing-site-for-quality/#comment-512</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip on S3, Robert; I wondered about just that! Let us know how it goes. 
 
I guess my top contenders are still blip.tv and revver, and not for the ad capability -- I like the players they&#039;re using, in terms of features / quality. Plus hosted service of course solves bandwidth problems. Would be curious to hear what people think of these. 
 
But yeah, Justin, I hear you for stuff that&#039;s likely to be low-bandwidth. I&#039;d still look at Flash, though, if you have a copy -- still lots of control over encoding, but a lot easier to deal with player-wise. 
 
I have some videos to upload, so I may just try some of the top services, especially if I get some unforgiving footage (as that Processing material certainly was)! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip on S3, Robert; I wondered about just that! Let us know how it goes. </p>
<p>I guess my top contenders are still blip.tv and revver, and not for the ad capability &#8212; I like the players they&#039;re using, in terms of features / quality. Plus hosted service of course solves bandwidth problems. Would be curious to hear what people think of these. </p>
<p>But yeah, Justin, I hear you for stuff that&#039;s likely to be low-bandwidth. I&#039;d still look at Flash, though, if you have a copy &#8212; still lots of control over encoding, but a lot easier to deal with player-wise. </p>
<p>I have some videos to upload, so I may just try some of the top services, especially if I get some unforgiving footage (as that Processing material certainly was)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007/03/ask-cdmo-readers-favourite-video-sharing-site-for-quality/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007/03/13/ask-cdmo-readers-favourite-video-sharing-site-for-quality/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Vimeo as well, at least for flv. Not as a result of any extensive research, but from what I had seen it looked better than the rest. 
 
But If I&#039;m doing quicktime, usually I want better quality. I&#039;ll just host it myself. I&#039;m no flight404, so worrying about bandwidth is a problem I&#039;d love to have. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been using Vimeo as well, at least for flv. Not as a result of any extensive research, but from what I had seen it looked better than the rest. </p>
<p>But If I&#039;m doing quicktime, usually I want better quality. I&#039;ll just host it myself. I&#039;m no flight404, so worrying about bandwidth is a problem I&#039;d love to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hodgin</title>
		<link>http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007/03/ask-cdmo-readers-favourite-video-sharing-site-for-quality/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hodgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007/03/13/ask-cdmo-readers-favourite-video-sharing-site-for-quality/#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Vimeo was a reasonable solution, but certainly not an ideal one.  I decided to go with Amazon S3 web service because it allows me to store the videos on Amazon&#039;s servers and I pay a relatively small amount for the bandwidth.  Another good option would be Dreamhost or some other comparable service that offers terabytes of bandwidth for under 50 bucks a month.  I went with Omnis a while back and now I wish I had done a little more research.  Omnis only allows for 500GB bandwidth and they have a policy where they dont charge you for overages, they simply shut you down.  Boo!!!  So S3 is my solution for now.  Seems to be working fine (but it is a bit slower than I would like). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vimeo was a reasonable solution, but certainly not an ideal one.  I decided to go with Amazon S3 web service because it allows me to store the videos on Amazon&#039;s servers and I pay a relatively small amount for the bandwidth.  Another good option would be Dreamhost or some other comparable service that offers terabytes of bandwidth for under 50 bucks a month.  I went with Omnis a while back and now I wish I had done a little more research.  Omnis only allows for 500GB bandwidth and they have a policy where they dont charge you for overages, they simply shut you down.  Boo!!!  So S3 is my solution for now.  Seems to be working fine (but it is a bit slower than I would like).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

