Create Digital Motion

daniel reetz

These works with OpenCV and Processing are really exciting.

What are the chances you’d do an “ask the community” post on the state of webcams with Processing on Windows/Mac/Linux? We could all do more vision if we had working cameras…

February 11th, 2009 @ 7:19 am

Andy Best

I guess it is true what you say about all of the OpenCV stuff being just as fast due to the library being in C++, but I find that the performance hit comes when writing the OpenCV image onto the Processing window (stage?). I’m not sure if it is just me, but I’m finding it a lot faster to use a blend() command to put the image into the window than just using image().

@daniel reetz As I understand it, webcam support is pretty good on Windows (being that most webcams will have windows drivers). I believe it depends on the video capture method that you use though (you might want to try different libraies to see which one works best for you- processing.video, jMyron, OpenCV capture etc). As for OS X, I believe that the webcam usually has to be compatible with QuickTime, however, there is an open source driver that has support for quite a few webcams here http://is.gd/14jH (Support for some cams is better than others).

February 11th, 2009 @ 8:28 am

Peter Kirn

Ah, yes — now that’s because PImage and image() specifically weren’t really intended for high performance or video. You can use GSVideo and GLGraphics for a much more efficient solution there.

I’d love an ask the community on working webcams; sounds like a great idea. Was there something specific you wanted to ask, or just to see what folks are using?

February 11th, 2009 @ 8:42 am

Andy Best

Peter Kirn- I shall have a look into them, thanks for the tip

February 11th, 2009 @ 8:53 am

naus3a

i really want to get my hands wet with GSVideo: my computer vision sketches work quite smooth, but when i add a mixed reality layers stuff begin to get heavy. by the way i’m working these days on a real world mixed reality presentation/gig tool… it could be a nice test

February 11th, 2009 @ 11:16 am

daniel reetz

Andy, you’re correct that most webcams have a driver on Windows but my previous experience with Processing and WinVDIG was totally miserable. I tried three different webcams, and ended up only getting one of them to work, at a miserable 320×240. I’ll check out the different libraries, thanks.

I could try to outline a question, but maybe outlining a goal makes more sense — what would be cool is if we’d all find that one model of webcam that had good enough performance (say, VGA at 30fps) and worked on and with *everything*, ideally with a “native” driver — the community model I’ve seen before is the way the wireless hacking community finds well-performing, permissive wireless cards that work on Windows, Linux, and Mac. Macam, linked above by Andy, looks pretty close.

I mean, sure, I can buy the Logitech whatever, install their sheds of crapware, and it will *probably* work (or I can return it and lose only the hours of screwing around with it), but it’s hard to find these experiences and this kind of information in a database or forum. Perhaps that’s because for the people it works for, it works well and without much effort, and for the others, it’s too frustrating to get started. Having spent hours playing with different cameras and Googling around, the input of people with working setups would be invaluable.

February 11th, 2009 @ 1:03 pm

Peter Kirn

Hey Daniel,
WinVDIG is a disaster. Avoid at all costs. In fact, I think it’s fair to say with Processing NO ONE should be using the default QuickTime library unless they’re on a Mac and really desperate. The path forward I believe is going to be GSVideo wrapping native support on each platform (even QuickTime Java, on which Processing’s default video library is based, doesn’t really count as “native” on the Mac, because it’s a deprecated, dead library).

GSVideo or the native capture routines in OpenCV will both serve you well.

Oh, and also avoid Logitech at all costs. (I know, I’m full of great news here.) I’ve seen major conflicts between their drivers and audio, and other significant sources of instability. Certainly, you don’t want to install their video driver.

But I agree absolutely — shared video knowledge would be huge. Maybe we can even have a little Processing install / test party with these libraries and cameras on IRC for cdmotion.

February 11th, 2009 @ 1:40 pm

daniel reetz

Certainly, you don’t want to install their video driver.

Yeah, pretty sure that’s what hosed me in the end — the multiple driver installs irreversibly destroyed my ability to get new cams working. So, OK, no Logitech (no surprise, and I’ve had similar experiences with Creative products) and no WinVDIG (from your advice and my experience)… Which webcam to use, then?

February 11th, 2009 @ 1:48 pm

daniel reetz

And sure, I’d install an IRC client for such a party.

February 11th, 2009 @ 1:49 pm

Peter Kirn

Well, any driverless camera is your best first bet. I think Creative and even Logitech have a class-compliant camera… mine is a Live! Cam Optia or something? I’ll write it up.

February 11th, 2009 @ 1:50 pm

JasononCDM

I’ve installed the Open CV folder in libraries and now I’m getting an “unexpected token:|”error.

The line highlighted is: Go to Previous message | Go to Next message | Back to Messages

March 4th, 2009 @ 4:54 pm

adambentley

thanks for the tutorials. does anyone have experience using integrated laptop cameras with opencv and processing?

March 27th, 2009 @ 12:05 am

SysGOD

http://augmented.taba.ru/  My page with video of Ogre3D augmented reality

May 30th, 2010 @ 12:17 pm

Shervin Emami

If you want to learn how to do Face Detection and Face Recognition in OpenCV, there is a tutorial and source-code at
http://www.shervinemami.co.cc/faceRecognition.html
It also has some other OpenCV tutorials that you might like.

June 8th, 2010 @ 5:02 pm