v-4ex_top

For years, the Roland V-4 was the battle axe of the VJ and visual performance scene. Not owning one almost meant you weren’t serious about playing. And the ubiquity of these at community events meant more collaborative and back-to-back sets.

Then computers evolved past – and even dropped – composite/component analog video outs, and the V-4 was left behind. The V-8 was a step forward, but still couldn’t keep up with the shift in video ins and outs.

At last, we get the Roland V-4EX. Like the original V-4, it’s a four-channel mixer with effects. And it shares the V-4′s classic layout. It also has the feature set that lets it handle HDMI ins and outs, even if they have copy protection.

In fact, we were so eager to see Roland finally fill this gap, that we were thrown for a bit of a loop when Roland outed its V-40HD. (It didn’t help that one excited Roland Systems Group rep described it to me as a successor to the V-4.) The V-40HD is an impressive, HD mixer, but despite having “V-4″ embedded in its name, it clearly isn’t quite a V-4 in heritage. (I would still say it’s related, but perhaps “Cousin of V-4″ is a more fitting title than “Son of V-4,” or, uh, “Bride of V-4.”)

The V-4EX is what Roland apparently views as the real successor. It’s out next week at Europe’s ISE trade show (featuring a keynote from friend-of-the-site digital magician Marco Tempest). The appearance at ISE suggests a bit more of a broadcast/systems industry application, but the V-4EX, unlike the V-4, does have performance in its spirit.

The big question is, will VJs blood be pumping having waited for these features so long. Specifically, it appears that while the V-4EX can upscale to higher resolutions, its internal engine runs at just 480P/576P – hence, no V-4HD moniker, presumably.

On the other hand, I’d challenge you to find something self-contained and portable like this with this kind of accessibility for mixing, input, output, and effects. (In fact, it’s precisely because we couldn’t find that that we’ve awaited this product so eagerly!)

It’s too soon to judge until we hear pricing. For now, availability is expected Q2, Roland tells CDM, and we should know more on pricing and other details before then.

v-4ex_back

Specs and some commentary (speculative, of course!):

  • Built-in effects derived from the V-4. (That’s what we like to hear. Well, for some of them, anyway!) 259 Transitions, 148 Effects.
  • Dials for effects on each bus, plus the master output fade dial. (Nice!)
  • Four-channel mixing.
  • Inputs 1-3: BNC or HDMI.
  • Input 4: HDMI, RGB/component, or S-video.
  • Output: Scaled-up HDMI, RGB/component, SD composite.
  • Aux output: HDMI output to a preview monitor.
  • Stereo RCA audio input for embedded audio in the HDMI outputs and USB stream (ideal if you’re streaming or recording).
  • USB video/audio class-compliant – connect to a computer, and you can record or stream over USB. (Roland has included their capture software for Windows, QuickTime Player – and many other apps – can handle this on the Mac.)
  • Video switcher (I’m hoping this can maintain full HD resolution, as then I’ll definitely stop complaining. You don’t need everything to be HD, but you might like some things to be.)
  • 4-frame delay compensation.
  • Inputs 1-3 accept resolutions 480p/576p; input 4 up to 1080p. RGB up to 1920×1200.
  • Output scaling up to 1080p or 1920 x 1200. (Again, I’m hoping you don’t have to up-scale when you switch, but only when you mix.)
  • HDCP compliance.
  • Multiviewer with touch controls, in a bit of a departure for the V-4 line.

http://www.roland.com/products/en/V-4EX/

  • http://www.facebook.com/chromatouch Leon Trimble

    ooh. ooh. ooh. i like hdmi but not fussed about hd. who would bring out a mixer for me? and it’s got a built in preview… and audio? really? av heaven, just hope it’s not £2000

    • Arne

      Actually, hidden in the small print, the say it’s not HD after all, only 480p / 576p.

    • stanley

      that’s right. pretty sad about it and the review on youtube showed that it only have quad preview at dropped-frame quality…

  • guest

    I think you’d be better off with the Blackmagic ATEM. No T bar but actual HD and under a grand.

  • Arne

    I’m afraid of getting too excited before I see the price :) But, for the right money, this thing is very welcome!

    Although if it is too much perhaps the D-Fuse Spark is still the best option. It seems to do a simple job well, and the V-4EX extra bells and whistles, while welcome, would not be fort paying all that much more for…

  • massta

    The V4 and V440 had a child here.

  • http://twitter.com/abadona Igor Molochevski

    I have to voice some concerns as @guest had. Right now ATEM can do a lot what mixer should do for performance. Rolland would probably charge around 1400 to 1699 for the mixer…