Rolling Your Own Blu-ray Discs: It’s Not Far Off

Photo: Billaday, via Flickr. I think the label says something about Blu-ray being awesome, and don’t stare into the laser, and go buy a PlayStation 3 because you really need one.

During the high-definition wars, your feelings about new higher-capacity storage discs may have ranged from ambivalence to dread to simple disinterest. (Well, that’s how I felt, anyway.) But with Blu-ray triumphant comes this realization: "hey, brain, we’ve suddenly got increasingly-affordable ways of burning high-capacity media!" Drive upgrades on the PC side cost what DVD burners once did, and if you’re hooked up to a TV, the writer can be your player, too. (There’s already a Lite-On internal drive for around US$350, and I expect these prices will plummet as production ramps up.)

That’s burning, anyway — authoring is obviously essential.

read more

The Battle for Analog: VHS and the Evils of DVD

Sure, the name of the site may be Create Digital Motion, but don’t get me wrong — we know digital is evil. Or, specifically, digital gets real evil at certain times. There are the latency-inducing, problem-causing HDMI cables when VGA or S-Video or Composite would do the job, the “look at our brand, new storage format” trend that turns out to be “look at the hideously onerous, new copy protection method we’ve just invented.”

We know a little bit of our soul died when we brought in all this digital tech to our work. (Happy side note, though: my eyes now glow red. It’s totally awesome at parties.) So, we now proudly present The Battle for Analog, a completely nonsensical look at the analog world we might leave behind. (Well, unless you carry some mobile VHS decks to a gig, which could be a great idea … a little magnetic distortion live, anyone?)

And to kick things off, we’ve got a look back at VHS’ stand against the puppy-killing DVD, via our friends at the All Retro, All The Time, Retro Thing. So, at the risk of “boneheaded nostalgia” as someone described this in comments on RT, I present this mock VHS PSA from musclebeaver, with music from the Transformers music proudly playing in the background:

And, uh, yeah, it does appear to have been crafted in After Effects. Where is that Export to VHS option in CS3, anyway?

PS - I think Blu-Ray winning out over HD-DVD is finally Sony’s revenge for losing on superior Betamax.

Pinnacle Video Transfer: Grab Analog Video Without a Computer

By vade
pinnacle-video-transfer-2.jpg

Pinnacle’s new Video Transfer box is a portable analog video (S-video/Y-c and composite) and stereo audio (RCA) h.264 encoder. The Video Transfer box has no built in storage - you supply it. Touting iPod video compatibility and USB Mass storage support, you can in theory hook up any USB 2.0 device to record video to.

With selectable quality (Good, Better, Best - sound familiar?), the Video Transfer supports iPod Video, Nano (third gen) and iPod Classic, as well as the PSP and PSP Slim, USB 2.0 flash drives and USB 2.0 hard drives. I’m guessing no Touch/iPhone support due to the lack of USB Disk Mode. ‘Tis a shame. Ed.: That likely knocks out Zune and a few other devices, as well — if you’re listening, oh device manufacturers, we really, really, really prefer to buy devices with this feature!

Grab a nice big, cheap, old USB 2.0 and route S-Video off of the back of your Edirol V4 mixer and have instant hour-long, high-quality web and PMP ready gig recordings. Sounds perfect.

The best news? It’s coming January 15th for only US$129.99. Awesome.

Via Engadget, and Macworld.com.

Now, what to do about the other end? How about a 500GB - 1TB LaCie external hard drive with composite / S-Video / component video output? You’ll never need a DVD player hooked up to your mixer again.

LaCie’s LaCinema Premier external HDD surfaces [Engadget]

LaCie video hard drive

Refresh: Asides

Hard Drive Mortality Rates: When to Replace Those Old Drives -

Hard drives are the skeleton and lifeblood of digital video. Musicians and other audio-botherers seem constantly amazed by the amount of space required for DV and especially HD-Video projects (with uncompressed HD capture inhabiting an entirely different level), while my video-based friends seem to be ever carrying around stacks of Firewire or USB hard drives for capturing and storing their collections of media.

So a large study of which drives fail most often and when drives are most likely to fail would be of great use to the visualist community. Fortunately, Google - possibly the largest purveyor of hard drive genocide the world has ever known - has run a study covering 5 years and over 100,000 drives, and the results have been condensed by Dan:

You know how mechanics put a little sticker in the corner of your windscreen to remind you when your car will need another service? Hard drives should come with something similar.

Because, one way or another, all hard drives are going to die.

Personally, I start feeling nervous about my drives when they hit their second birthday. Since they’ve then spent almost all of those two years cheek-by-jowl with other drives in the disk-farm PCs I favour, this is not entirely irrational. But, thanks to a couple of recent studies, I now know that it’s less rational than I thought it was.

Google’s study of more than a hundred thousand drives over five years is useful as much for what it says about how hard it is to figure this stuff out, as for what it actually found.

It turns out that working drives hard, or running them warmer than recommended, doesn’t seem to have much of an impact on their life. And the popular idea that failures follow a “bathtub curve”, in which any drive that doesn’t die in the first three months is likely to live for five years, also seems to be invalid. Drives actually just slowly wear out over their lives, like other mechanical devices.

Dan’s writeup is aimed at geeks in general, but I don’t see anything there which isn’t perfectly reasonable and applicable to my geek specialty.

Refresh: Asides

Off The Shelf RAID 5 for Uncompressed Editing on HD4NDs -

Mike has a bit of a discussion on using RAID for uncompressed editing. Mac-centric, but the same issues apply for the PC world. Mike links to a 2 reviews (here and here) of the Caldigit HDPro (US$8000 for 6TB). A little expensive, but one of his commentors points out that DIY systems can be put together for about 50% of the price.

Probably not particularly useful information for your next club VJ gig, but for those of us who are starting to edit in HD (and like myself, glancing towards uncompressed HDMI capture) the combination of high write speeds and data security are most beguiling. I’ll definitely be looking towards a DIY solution in the coming months so I can migrate from my current “bunch of projects spread across multiple hard drives and backed up occasionally” system to something more robust.

Refresh: Asides

Tapeless Progress: Panasonic P2 Software for Mac -

One of the reasons I decided against the Panasonic HVX-200 when choosing my HD camera was that there wasn’t OSX software to import P2 cards. This has now changed with Panasonic releasing P2 Contents Management Software for Mac.

A little late, and you probably already heard this via HD for Indies. You read HD4NDS, right?

Refresh: Asides

Ask CDMo Readers: Favourite Video Sharing Site for Quality? -

We’ve previously covered online distribution services which allow you to sell or otherwise monetize your video, but what if you’re just wanting to share and display your videos in the best possible light? There’s always Youtube, but the compression will mangle your beautifully rendered and painstakingly edited clips to death. Robert/Flight404 has dealt with this recently, as his Supernova/Magnetosphere pieces ate all of his bandwidth in a couple of days. Robert has settled on Vimeo, but I’m sure there are other options. If you have any thoughts on what gives the best mix of filesize and quality, hit the comments.
[tags]youtube, vimeo, video-editing, sharing, stock, storage, web[/tags]

Attach Your Storage to the Network: NAS Setup and Links

By Jaymis

DVGuru have reminded me about something on my projects list which really should be assigned a higher priority: Networked storage. Australian Tech Blogger of Uberness Dan has touched on this in the past and a more recent article which includes a magic list of NAS devices which allow drive spin-down. This is critical; a consumer hard drive left turned on 24/7 (which is likely for a NAS) will have its live expectancy drastically reduced if the device doesn’t power down the drive when not in use. The Mapower device from the Automated Home article does include customizable spin-down. Dan’s original pick is the Netgear SC101 Storage Central, which has spin-down via a firmware update, accepts up to 2 drives and costs under US$100. It’s PC only though, and the reviews aren’t particularly positive (Requires proprietary software to access the data? Yuck!) so hunting down one of the other options may be worthwhile. Amazon shows a resonable selection.

Personally, I already have a webserver/media server/bittorrent machine which runs 24/7. So I’m going to drop my NAS budget on a gigabit ethernet card, gigabit switch, and a couple of hefty drives.